The NFT universe is all the rage, but it’s not a positive trend. We’re in the midst of a delicious scrum right now. We’re especially focusing on where and how to store NFT images, specifically within the Bitcoin ecosystem. On the other side, you have voices from the likes of Tuur Demeester who are sounding the alarm with equally good reasons about the fragility of off-chain storage. If those JPEGs have to go on external servers or worse, IPFS, he asks, is that really what decentralization means? To raise it so high, he’s right!

On-Chain Purity, At What Cost?

The case for on-chain storage – embedding the entire image directly into the Bitcoin blockchain – is enticing, isn’t it? Immutability! Permanence! Security! Walk with us, for a moment, beyond the siren song of technical purity. We need to ask ourselves: who really benefits?

Think about it. Bitcoin isn’t built for hashing mountains of data. Loading the blockchain with high-resolution images clogs up the network, driving up transaction fees and making the process sluggish. Who feels that pinch the most? It’s certainly not the blue-chip NFT projects with the deep pockets.

Forgotten Voices: The Creator Economy

It’s those independent artists, those small-time creators, the same folks who contributed to creating the bustling creative NFT space we have today. Quite frankly, many of these creators are from underrepresented communities all across South Asia and the diaspora. Their art depends on it, their families’ livelihood depends on it.

Now, imagine not being able to easily and efficiently collect royalties for a project. Every transaction starts to get expensive since the base image is swelling the Bitcoin blockchain. Suddenly, enforcing your rights becomes prohibitively expensive. It’s okay for the big players because they can eat those costs, but the little guy gets pinched.

This is not a purely abstract technical challenge, it’s a matter of economic justice. It's about ensuring that the promise of NFTs – democratizing art and empowering creators – doesn't become another broken promise.

In trying to do so much with security, we’re losing sight of accessibility. We're so busy debating the technical merits of on-chain versus off-chain, we're ignoring the human cost of our decisions.

Security vs. Accessibility Trade-Off?

What’s the point of a perfectly secure NFT if it is impossible for the very artists that it is designed to empower to use it. Because what good is a technically pristine blockchain if the whole world of creators is shut out?

Whatever the answer, it has to be one that recognizes the need for security but a degree of affordability and permanence. Maybe it’s a hybrid model, maybe it’s something completely new – I don’t pretend to have all the answers. I know this: we need to start listening to the forgotten voices in this debate. We need to prioritize the needs of creators, especially those from marginalized communities, and ensure that the NFT ecosystem remains a place of opportunity for all.

This isn’t just an issue demonstrated by NFTs. It’s emblematic of a larger trend in the tech world. We get so caught up in the technical possibilities that we forget to ask ourselves: who is this technology really serving? It should remind us to always pay attention to the unintended consequences of our actions. Together, let’s ensure that technology is always a tool for empowerment—never a weapon that can be used to harm or disqualify anyone.

Let’s not allow the pursuit of technical perfection to make us lose sight of the very real human costs. Let’s work towards a more diverse, fair, innovative NFT space – one that empowers artists to flourish, not just exist. Let's make sure everyone can participate. The latter is a failure of the very ethos that made NFTs cool to begin with.

This debate is not over by a long-shot, but the stakes are higher than you realize.

  • OpenSea
  • Magic Eden
  • LooksRare
  • X2Y2

This isn't just about NFTs; it's about a broader trend in the tech world. We get so caught up in the technical possibilities that we forget to ask ourselves: who is this technology really serving? We need to be more mindful of the unintended consequences of our actions and ensure that technology remains a tool for empowerment, not a force for exclusion.

Let's not let the pursuit of technical perfection blind us to the very real human costs. Let's build a more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable NFT ecosystem – one where artists can thrive, not just survive. Let's make sure everyone can participate. The alternative is a betrayal of the very principles that made NFTs exciting in the first place.

This debate is far from over, and the stakes are higher than you think.